The big issue brought up in five degrees is the problem of habitability.
Several themes mentioned in previous chapters continue to deteriorate in five
degrees.
The various issues are as follows:
- No ice sheets will remain as melting becomes inevitable.
- Rain forests shrink or completely disappear (Like Dr. Karowe spoke of biome switches, so rain forests turning into savannas etc.)
- Sea levels continue to rise; meaning floods increase.
- Droughts as geographical areas such as the Sahara, Kalahari, Western Sahel etc. expand.
- Inland temperatures raise more than 100
- New deserts will form because of these inland temperature changes and expansion of deserts in places in East Africa, Chile, Southern Europe etc.
- Not all places will lose the ability to grow food or continue to be bread baskets, but places that are lucky won’t be able to feed the entire population. These places include Russia and Canada.
- Methane hydrates will increase due to ocean temperature increase meaning more greenhouse gases. It is at 5 degrees Lyman believes that is where we reach the point of no return.
![]() |
| Habitable zones |
The issue that was brought up, that was interesting to me
was the idea of habitability. Dr. Tim Palmer used an example in class of increasing
sea levels in Miami, will allow people to still move inland. Though places like
Bangladesh, there is no more inland space that will be habitable and therefore
that will cause refugee crises, even wars over resources such as land. I believe
sometimes we forget the earth is finite and has its own boundaries and yes,
even with technology we cannot make all space on earth habitable. Therefore,
climate change should be an alerting issue.

You bring up a really good point about how after so much time there just won't be the space available for all of the people that need to relocate. Perhaps with increasing temperatures people will be able to go further North, but that is only a temporary fix and will still cause struggle over many different resources.
ReplyDeleteThe point that you made about habitability being a problem is a good one. If the sea levels start rising as predicted there will be many countries facing these problems with no where to go.
ReplyDeleteThe point that you made about habitability being a problem is a good one. If the sea levels start rising as predicted there will be many countries facing these problems with no where to go.
ReplyDeleteI like how you included information about what Dr. Tim Palmer spoke about in our class and tied it into the reading! Rising sea level is something I think a lot of people forget about when it comes to the environment and its well-being.
ReplyDeleteThe migration north seems to be the common trend for the increase temperatures. With the areas closer to the equator becoming uninhabitable.
ReplyDeleteIt seems like at this point there aren't many new effects, but rather, the acceleration of the effects that were a result from lower degrees of warming. I wonder where those areas of habitability would be with this degree of warming-- I'm guessing probably inland areas with traditionally moderate temperatures with high elevations.
ReplyDeleteI read an article on FB a couple of weeks ago (source was not scholarly, so I'm not sure how reputable it was) about how Michigan could become the best place to live in an era of extreme climate change (fresh water, moderate temps and no severe weather). It made me think about migration and its effect on our state. It sounds like that kind of migration is pretty plausible.
ReplyDeleteI think this is a really good point - When talking about climate change I often mention that we are in a moderately risky location. People never seem to know what I am talking about until I remind them that we have the largest system of freshwater, a resource that is only becoming more and more valuable by the day. I think that people forget what others might be willing to do for the Great Lakes water if they become desperate enough...
DeleteI like that you mentioned technology; I commonly hear people say that we have nothing to worry about because we will just out engineer the rapid changes that are occurring. I think that you are correct when you say that even with technology, we still will not have enough habitable land. And that doesn't even consider everything else that we are going to have shortages of.
ReplyDelete